Why did the Wolf Man “take over” the classic Universal Monster series?
It occurs to me that it may be because Larry Talbot actually had a character, backstory, and potential arc — looking for a cure. Whereas Dracula is just a fiend, and the Frankenstein Monster, post Karloff, a misunderstood and dangerous brute. Both of those 2 (and the Mummy, for that matter), just do their monster thing.
Talbot, on the other hand, can have relationships and built pathos. That’s why once you teamed him with Frankenstein, it became almost unavoidable the films would focus on him. (It helps that Chaney is brilliant as Talbot — his best role.)
It would be interesting to know what might have happened if the FM had retained Ygor’s brain and intellect — or if they’d hit on the Dracula looks for a cure idea (that came about in House of Dracula). Later, a similar notion worked very well for Barnabas Collins (whose backstory has since been folded into post-Dark Shadows Dracula stories).
Of course, I love the Universal classics just the way they are, but it’s fun to speculate.
And please consider supporting my monster story Patreon at www.CushingHorrors.com.